The Prussian education system, a historical prototype that birthed many frameworks of contemporary schooling, wasn't merely a setup for imparting education.

It served dual roles - furthering state ambitions, specifically military ones, and functioning as a device for controlling and molding the populace.

As we progress into a world increasingly influenced by artificial intelligence and perpetually under the sway of state and corporate propaganda, the implications of such an obedience-focused model cannot be overstated.

This system, with its potential to dampen individual thought and stifle critical thinking - elements vital to a thriving democratic society - demands our serious attention.

The rise of platforms like Blocvote, a decentralized platform enabling direct democracy, underscores the urgency of fostering critical thought. Only when citizens are enabled to think critically can we truly leverage the power of truly democratic society..

The Prussian Model and The War Effort

In the early 19th century, post-Napoleonic Prussia faced a dire need for national unity and societal resilience. Central to achieving these goals was the reformation of the education system.

This overhaul wasn't just a military strategy but a result of converging social, economic, and philosophical forces. Their shared objective: a disciplined, unified, patriotic citizenry, ready to support national endeavors. The detailed teaching methods and curricula were not just about creating obedient soldiers, but about cultivating order, duty, and hierarchy.

State influence was evident in classrooms, with a state-dictated curriculum promoting patriotism, duty, and loyalty. The subtle interweaving of education and propaganda fostered national unity. Yet, the Prussian education system was not merely a control tool. It also emphasized public education's role in social unity and progress, aiming to educate all citizens, irrespective of social class.

Thus, the Prussian schools served dual purposes: creating disciplined, patriotic citizens and facilitating social mobility and unity. The system ingeniously blended military strategy, social engineering, and belief in education. However, its emphasis on obedience and state-centered knowledge made its citizens more susceptible to propaganda.

The Classroom as a Control Mechanism Prussian classrooms embodied the power dynamics between state and citizens. The teacher was the authority, much like the state, regulating information flow. The state-decided curriculum instilled a defined set of beliefs and values, shaping not just what students learned but how they thought.

Classrooms became echo chambers of state-approved narratives, stifling individual thought. The curriculum promoted collective identity and national pride, fostering unity and loyalty to the state. Thus, the classroom was more than a learning space—it mirrored and reinforced societal norms, making the Prussian education system a formidable tool for social control.

The Classroom as a Control Mechanism

The teacher-centric model that was prevalent in Prussian classrooms mirrored the power dynamics between the state and its citizens. In this setup, the teacher acted as the authority, disseminating information to passive students who were expected to absorb this knowledge without questioning its veracity.

This model became a tangible representation of the state's approach to information control. The teacher, like the government, determined the flow of information. The curriculum, decided by the state, was a tool to instill a prescribed set of beliefs and values in the students. This design extended beyond merely controlling what students learned; it was about defining how they thought, making it an exercise in behavioral control as much as it was an academic pursuit.

In this context, classrooms transformed into echo chambers, reinforcing state-approved narratives and suppressing individual thought and critical reasoning. These dynamics effectively solidified the state's control over its citizens by ensuring a population that was less likely to challenge state narratives or disrupt the societal order.

However, the control mechanism was not just about strict hierarchy and rigid discipline. It was also about fostering a sense of unity and shared purpose. The curriculum emphasized collective identity, national pride, and a shared destiny. These teachings were intended to create a sense of community among the citizens, promoting social cohesion and loyalty to the state.

Through this multifaceted approach, the classroom became more than a space for learning. It was a microcosm of the larger society, reflecting and reinforcing the norms and values of the Prussian state. In this sense, the Prussian education system was a sophisticated tool for social control, shaping not just the minds but also the hearts of its citizens.

The Prussian Model, Propaganda, Global State Control, and AI

In a world increasingly dependent on technology, the potential implications of the Prussian education model go beyond the individual or national level. They extend to how society interacts with the global digital sphere, especially with the growing influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and potential state control at a global scale.

Today, information flows freely, and tech giants, often in concert with state entities, are the new power brokers, controlling and shaping this information. They use AI and algorithms to dictate what we see and read online, indirectly shaping our perceptions and opinions1. Given the ubiquity of technology in our lives, this power dynamic can have a profound impact on our understanding of truth and our ability to critically assess information.

The Prussian model's legacy, marked by a reliance on authority for knowledge, may inadvertently make us more susceptible to these forces. It risks fostering a population that accepts information passively, without questioning its source or intent. This lack of critical analysis can be exploited by state or corporate entities to subtly control public discourse and opinion, leading to a form of digital propaganda that is all the more dangerous because it is often invisible.

This situation is made more complex by the involvement of AI. As AI becomes more sophisticated, it can be used to manipulate information and public opinion in increasingly nuanced ways. In a society untrained in critical thinking, these manipulations can go unnoticed, leading to a form of control that is pervasive yet hidden.

The interplay between the Prussian model's legacy, corporate and state influence, and AI is a complex issue that needs to be critically examined. To navigate this interconnected world, we need an education system that promotes critical thinking, digital literacy, and an understanding of AI. It is not enough to be passive consumers of information; we need to be active participants in the digital dialogue, capable of discerning truth from manipulation.

The Socratic Method: A Beacon of Individual Thought

Named after the classical Greek philosopher Socrates, the Socratic method of teaching embodies an ethos diametrically opposed to that of the Prussian model. Instead of relying on the authority of the teacher to impart knowledge, the Socratic method encourages a cooperative argumentative dialogue between individuals. It stimulates critical thinking and intellectual independence.

In a Socratic classroom, the teacher is more of a guide than an authority figure. Their role is not to disseminate knowledge unilaterally but to foster a learning environment where students question, analyze, and form their own understanding. The teacher poses questions designed to expose contradictions in the students' beliefs and ideas, thereby provoking them to refine their thoughts through critical analysis.

The Socratic method, therefore, empowers the learner. It promotes the idea that truth isn't something handed down from above, but a reality that's continually interrogated, explored, and constructed. This process encourages students to become active seekers of knowledge rather than passive recipients. It fosters a classroom culture of curiosity, inquiry, and intellectual rigor, paving the way for a society that values individual thought and critical reasoning.

But the Socratic method isn't just about the development of intellectual skills. It's also about cultivating a particular mindset. It helps students understand the complexity and ambiguity inherent in knowledge and fosters a sense of intellectual humility. This understanding can be a powerful antidote to the dogmatic certainty that often accompanies propaganda and manipulation.

As we navigate an increasingly complex world, the principles of the Socratic method — intellectual independence, critical thinking, and a healthy skepticism towards authority — are more crucial than ever. Embracing this pedagogical approach can prepare us not just to resist manipulation but also to actively shape the narratives of our time.

Steps Forward for Families: Fostering Critical Thought

Taking a step towards fostering critical thinking at home might seem challenging, but it's far from impossible. Parents can foster an environment that encourages questioning, fosters curiosity, and promotes intellectual independence. It begins with small steps that collectively have a profound impact on a child’s development.

As we equip our children with these skills, we're also preparing them for active participation in the digital revolution of direct democracy. Blocvote is reshaping the landscape of civic engagement by enabling citizens to have a direct say in decision-making processes. To use Blocvote effectively, citizens need to scrutinize information, assess different viewpoints, and make informed decisions — skills that are at the core of critical thinking.

By promoting critical thinking, we're not just equipping our children with valuable cognitive skills; we're preparing them to be active, discerning citizens in a world where the voices of ordinary people can, via Blocvote, carry significant weight. We're not just teaching them to learn; we're teaching them to participate, to engage, and to shape the society they inhabit:

1. Encourage Curiosity and Questions: Foster an environment at home where curiosity is celebrated and questions are encouraged1. Whether it's about a news story, a scientific phenomenon, or a social issue, encourage your child to ask questions and explore different perspectives.

2. Promote Reading and Discussion: Encourage regular reading, but take it a step further by discussing the material with your child2. Ask them to summarize what they've read, question assumptions, or consider alternate viewpoints. This exercise can help them form an opinion, learn to validate their beliefs with evidence, and understand multiple perspectives.

3. Introduce the Socratic Method at Home: You can implement the Socratic method during discussions at home3. Instead of giving direct answers, respond to your child's queries with thought-provoking questions. This technique encourages them to think deeply, articulate their thoughts, and become more comfortable with ambiguity and complexity.

4. Teach Them About Media Literacy: In an age where misinformation can spread like wildfire, media literacy is a crucial skill4. Teach your children to evaluate the credibility of sources, understand the context, and recognize potential bias in information.

5. Encourage Participation in Debate or Drama: Activities such as debate or drama can hone their analytical skills, promote empathy by understanding different perspectives, and improve their ability to communicate complex ideas5.

6. Model Critical Thinking: Your actions and behavior significantly influence your child's attitude towards critical thinking. Demonstrate how you approach problems, make decisions, and handle contradictions in your everyday life. Show them that it's okay to change one's mind when presented with new evidence.

By integrating these practices into daily life, families can foster an environment that values critical thinking, curiosity, and independent thought. As these skills develop, children will become better equipped to navigate the complexities of the modern world, resist manipulative narratives, and actively participate in shaping their own future.

Conclusion: Necessity of Individual Thought in Modern Society

Echoes of the Prussian model linger in many of today's education systems, prompting us to carefully consider the long-term implications of an educational model founded on obedience and conformity. Are these systems unwittingly fostering susceptibility to top-down control, manipulation by state and corporate propaganda, and the potentially overwhelming influence of globally-connected AI technologies?

As we continue on this shared journey, let us gently embrace the qualities of independent thought, reasoning, and creativity, traits championed by the Socratic method. Let's strive to see our schools as vibrant learning communities that empower individuals to think, question, and create, rather than factories producing uniform outputs.

In the ongoing discourse against misinformation, propaganda, and the potential misuse of AI, critical thinking is not just a shield; it's a beacon illuminating our path forward.

The time has come to welcome a future where every voice counts, and tools like Blocvote are making that future a reality today. Equip yourself, equip your children, equip your community with the power of thought, and join us in taking a step forward into a brighter democratic future.

Join the conversation by following @blocvoteorg and spread the word about this vital topic. Share this post and help light the path for others towards a more democratic and critically thoughtful society.

References

West, E. G. (1965). The Prussian Elementary Schools. The American Historical Review, 70(4), 1032-1043.

Zajda, J. (2010). Globalisation, Ideology and Education Policy Reforms. Dordrecht: Springer.

Curtis, B. (1988). Building the Educational State: Canada West, 1836-1871. London, ON: Althouse Press.

Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1).

West, T. G. (1994). The Socratic Method. In The roots of American order. Washington, D.C: Regnery Gateway.

Billings, L. (2000). Teaching and the Socratic Method. In Critical Teaching and Everyday Life. Chicago, Ill: Chicago Review Press.

Gregory, M. (2007). The Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy. Yale Review of Undergraduate Research in Psychology, 2007.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking: The Nature of Critical and Creative Thought. Journal of Developmental Education, 30(2), 34.

Tredway, G. (1995). Socratic Seminars: Engaging Students in Intellectual Discourse. Educational Leadership, 53(1), 26-29.

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.

Gregory, M., & Holloway, M. (2005). The Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy. Yale Review of Undergraduate Research in Psychology, 1, 27-35.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Israel, S. E. (2002). Using Metacognitive Assessments to Create Individualized Reading Instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute.

Finegan, K. R., Nicolson, R. I., & Thomas, M. G. (1994). The Role of Drama and Speaking Skills in Fostering the Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Intelligence of Twice-exceptional Students. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 16(4), 300-304.