Unpacking The Divisive Tactics Used in Politics

Although Jeremy Corbyn appears to be advocating for anti-racism and compassion in this tweet, it can be argued that it is divisive and designed to fuel conflict due to its language and framing.

““After the horrific events in Knowsley, thousands of anti-racist campaigners have mobilised in Liverpool to stand up for refugees. We will not let the far-right divide us. We are a mass movement, united in our belief in a more compassionate, caring and peaceful world.””

Jeremy Corbyn

The phrase "We will not let the far-right divide us" implies that there is a clear and divisive line between the "us" (anti-racist campaigners) and the "them" (far-right individuals or groups). This dichotomy suggests that there is no room for discussion or compromise between the two sides, and that the only way to address the issue is by mobilizing against one group. This can create an "us vs. them" mentality that can further polarize the situation and make it difficult to find common ground.

Furthermore, the use of the phrase "mass movement" can also be seen as divisive, as it implies a clear divide between those who are part of the movement and those who are not. This can create an atmosphere of exclusion and make it difficult to engage with individuals or groups who may have different opinions or perspectives.

While the tweet's intention may be to stand up against racism and promote unity, the language and framing used can be seen as divisive and potentially counterproductive in the long term. A more inclusive and empathetic approach may be more effective in promoting understanding and positive change.

If that's the case, what would an inclusive tweet look like that aims to heal society and promote unity?

After the tragic events in Knowsley, thousands of anti-racist campaigners have come together in Liverpool to show support for refugees.

We believe in a more compassionate, caring, and peaceful world and are committed to working towards this goal. It's important to remain united and avoid division, and we hope to promote a spirit of cooperation and understanding between all members of our community.

This highlights the contrast between partisan politics that can create toxicity and division, and direct democracy, which prioritizes addressing issues over personal attacks or divisive rhetoric.

Please end examples of divisive tweets to us at hello@blocvote.org we are always ready to call out the haters from all sides of the political debate.

Previous
Previous

Constructing Conflict

Next
Next

BLOCVOTE 0.21 (AI)